Implementasi Metode Technique For Order By Similarity To Ideal Solution (Topsis) Dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Kelayakan Penerimaan Kredit

I Putu Eka Sudarsana

Authors

I Putu Eka Sudarsana Politeknik eLBajo Commodus, Labuan Bajo

Keywords:

Decision Support System, Technique for Order by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), Mean Average Precision (MAP).

Abstract

The objective of this study is to apply a Decision Support System approach to evaluate and suggest business credit approval at Tani Karya Sejahtera Cooperative. Technique for Order by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) is the name of this approach. Five criteria are used in this research: Building Land Tax (PBB), Income, Guarantee, Business Establishment Permit (SIUP), and Loan Application Form (FPP). In addition to applying the Topsis approach, method testing was done. This seeks to determine the most relevant/appropriate approach to assessment-taking. The accuracy of debtor rankings is tested using the MAP approach as part of the testing procedure. Using the top 10 ranking data, the MAP methodology was used to assess the TOPSIS method's implementation. The test results indicated that the TOPSIS method was a method with good accuracy, with a MAP test value of 66%. Since the TOPSIS method demonstrated a fairly high degree of accuracy in this study, it is believed that more research will be able to refine the approach.

References

Asri Zaen, M., Sunaryo, S., & Wijono, W. (2014). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Untuk Incestasi Perumahan Area Malang Menggunakan P Algoritma Bayesian. Jurnal EECCIS, 8(1), pp.13-18.

Azhari, A. A., Nyura, Y., & Najib, A. (2018). Perbandingan Metode SAW dan TOPSIS Pada Penerimaan Siswa Praktek Kerja Lapangan. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Teknologi Informasi Dan Multimedia, 6 – 8.

Effendy, D. A., & Irawan, R. H. (2015). Uji Sensitivitas metode WP, SAW, Dan TOPSIS Dalam Menentukan Titik Lokasi Reapiter Internet Wireless. Seminar Nasional Teknologi Informasi Dan Multimedia, 6-8.

Ifo Wahyu Pratama. (2018). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Evaluasi Kinerja Dosen dengan Metode Technique For Order By Similarity To Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) & Preference Ranking Organization For Evaluation (Promethee). XV(April), 35-42

Kaliszewski, I., & Podkopaev, D.(2016). Simple Additive Weighting – A Metamodel For Mutiple Criteria Decision Analysis Methods. Expert System with Applications, 54, 155 – 161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2016.01.042.

Luijendijk, A., Hagenaars, G., Ranasinghe, R., Baart, F., Donchyts, G., & Aarninkhof, S. (2018). The State of the World’s Beaches. Scientific Report,8(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-24630-6.

Muzakkir, I. (2017). Penerapan Metode TOPSIS Untuk Sistem Pendukung Kepusutasn Penentuan Keluarga Miskin Pada Desa Panca Karsa Ii. ILKOM Jurnal Ilmiah, 9(3), 274. https://doi.org/10.33096/ilkom.v9i3.156.274-281

Na’am, J. (2017) Sebuah Tinjauan Penggunaan Metode Analythic Hierarchy Process (AHP) dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan (SPK) pada Jurnal Berbahasa Indonesia. Jurnal Mediasisfo, 11(2), 888-895.

Seyedmohammadi, J., Sarmadian, F., Jafarzadeh, A. A., Ghorbani, M. A., & Shahbazi, F. (2018). Application of SAW, TOPSIS and fuzzy TOPSIS

Sudarsono, N., Nuraen, T., & Rahmawati, S. (2016). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemberian Bantuan Siswa Miskin di SD Negeri Sukamenak Kota Tasikmalaya Menggunakan Metode Technique for Order by Similarity to Edelan Solution (TOPSIS). Seminar Nasional Teknologi Informasi Dan Multimedia, 4 (1), 163-168.

Suka Parwita, W. G., & Winarko, E. (2015). Hybrid Recommendation System Memanfaatkan Penggalian Frequent Intemset dan Perbandingan Keyword. IJCCS (Indonesian Journal of Computing and Cybernetics System), 9(2),167.https://doi.org/10.22146/ijccs.7545

Somya, R., & Wardoyo, R. (2019). Perancangan SPK Seleksi Asisten Dosen Menggunakan Kombinasi Metode Profile Matching dan TOPSIS Berbasis Web Service. Khazanah Informatika: Jurnal Ilmu Komputer Dan Informatika, 5(1), 44-50. https://doi.org/1023917/khif.v5il.7924