Does Academic Preparedness Influence Performance? A Comparative Study Across Programs At Politeknik eLBajo Commodus
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63604/javok.v3i1.96Kata Kunci:
Academic Performance, Study Programs, ANOVA, Pre-admission Assessment, Student PreparednessAbstrak
This study investigates academic performance variations across study programs at Politeknik eLBajo Commodus, blending quantitative analysis with qualitative insights to provide a holistic view of student achievement. Employing an Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) on 'Tes Bakat Skolastik' scores, we sought to identify significant differences in academic performance among the programs. Additionally, casual interviews with students were conducted to explore their perceptions of program selection, academic preparedness, and the challenges encountered. Our methodology combined statistical rigor with a nuanced understanding of student experiences, offering a comprehensive analysis of the factors influencing academic success. The quantitative phase involved comparing mean scores across programs using ANOVA, while the qualitative phase entailed gathering subjective insights from students regarding their academic journey and preparation. The results revealed no statistically significant differences in performance across study programs, indicating a baseline uniformity in academic achievement. However, student interviews highlighted a significant gap in pre-admission knowledge about program expectations and personal academic readiness. These findings suggest the need for enhanced pre-enrollment assessments and orientation programs to better align student expectations with academic demands. In conclusion, this study underscores the importance of a holistic educational approach that encompasses both statistical analyses and the lived experiences of students, advocating for initiatives that support informed decision-making and academic preparedness at the tertiary level.
Referensi
Ashouri, M., Vahedi, S., Adib, Y., & Badri, R. (2021). Discovering the experience of failing university entrance exam among applicants: A grounded theory study. Journal of Psychological Science, 19(Journal of Psychological Science), 1593–1605.
Badan Pusat Statistik. (2021). Indeks Pembangunan Manusia (IPM) Tahun 2021. Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Manggarai Barat. (2021). Analisis Indeks
Pembangunan Manusia Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Manggarai Barat.
Davey, G., De Lian, C., & Higgins, L. (2007). The university entrance examination system in China. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 31(4), 385–396. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098770701625761
Graff Zivin, J., Song, Y., Tang, Q., & Zhang, P. (2020). Temperature and high- stakes cognitive performance: Evidence from the national college entrance examination in China. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2020.102365
HE, S., KEMPE, K., TOMIKI, Y., NISHIZUKA, M., SUZUKI, T., DAMBARA, T., & OKADA, T. (2015). Correlations Between Entrance Examination Scores and Academic Performance Following Admission. 順天堂醫事雑誌, 61(2), 142– 148. https://doi.org/10.14789/jmj.61.142
Maseleno, A., Huda, M., Siregar, M., Ahmad, R., Hehsan, A., Haron, Z., Ripin, M. N., Ihwani, S. S., & Jasmi, K. A. (2017). Combining the previous measure of evidence to educational entrance examination. Journal of Artificial Intelligence, 10(3), 85–90. https://doi.org/10.3923/jai.2017.85.90
Ming, H., & Qing, Z. (2023). Research on reform and trend of physical education high school entrance examination system under the background of “double reduction” policy. Frontiers in Educational Research, 6(26), 12–17. https://doi.org/10.25236/fer.2023.062603
Parviz, M. (2023). Reflecting on the consequences of the Iranian university entrance examination: a systematic-narrative hybrid literature review. Discover Education, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-023-00046-x
Politeknik eLBajo Commodus. (2022). Rencana Strategis Politeknik eLBajo Commodus Tahun 2022-2027. In Politeknik eLBajo Commodus (pp. 1–47).
Valli, R., & Johnson, P. (2007). Entrance eaminations as gatekeepers. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 51(5), 493–510. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830701576631
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Cara Mengutip
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2024 I Wayan Pio Pratama

Artikel ini berlisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.