Publication Ethics

Every journal submitted to JAVOK will be processed in the peer review stage as a JAVOK management model. Thus, it is necessary to agree on the standards of ethical behavior expected from all parties involved in the publishing process, namely the author, journal editor, and P3M Politeknik eLBajo Commodus.

Publication Decision

The editor is responsible for the decision of the articles to be published in JAVOK. The editor refers to the policies of the journal's editorial board and is constrained by legal provisions, such as libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editor can talk to other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Fair process

In the process of evaluating the content of the manuscript, the editors must be based on intellectual views without judgment based on race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the author.

Confidentiality

Information regarding the manuscript submitted by the user must not be disclosed to any other party, except the editor, reviewer, editorial board and publisher. Every manuscript received by the reviewer or editor must be treated as a confidential document. The contents of the manuscript must not be shown or discussed with others, except with the permission of the editor or author.

Conflict of Interest

Unpublished materials in a submitted manuscript must not be used in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

Information, data, and ideas obtained through peer review are confidential and must not be used for personal advantage. Reviewers are not obligated to consider manuscripts in which they have a conflict of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the manuscript.

Reviewer Duties

Provide views, suggestions or input on the decisions of the Editorial team. The Peer review process also assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through editorial communications with the author can also assist the author in improving the article produced.

Speed

Every manuscript submitted / submitted will be evaluated quickly before publication.

Objectivity Standards

The manuscript review process must be carried out objectively. The reviewer's views should not be personal criticism that does not have scientific arguments, so the views expressed must be clear and contain supporting arguments.

Source Statement

Reviewers should identify relevant work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had previously been reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. Reviewers should also consider any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the research.

Duties of Authors

Authors should present an accurate account of the research or study performed. The data presented should be consistent with the research report. The manuscript should be written in sufficient detail and should have sufficient references to enable others to refer to it appropriately. Fraudulent intent through the writing of published scientific papers is unacceptable.

Originality and Plagiarism

The authors must ensure that they have written entirely original works. If there is any use of the work and/or words of others, then the author must include this by quoting it in the text in accordance with applicable regulations.

An author should not publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal.

Authorship of the Manuscript

Authorship should be limited to individuals who have made a significant contribution to the completion of the manuscript. All individuals who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors.

The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and co-authors are included on the paper, and that all authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its publication.

Fundamental errors in published works

When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author's obligation to promptly contact the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.